
Thought Leadership

Thought Leadership
A look at Krista Glenn's December 2025 Carrier Management piece, and why rebuilding negotiation talent is a leadership decision, not a training one.
In Rebuilding Negotiation Talent: Why This Skill Is Missing and How to Fix It, published by Carrier Management on December 10, 2025, Krista Glenn (EVP and Chief Claims Officer at Westfield Specialty) makes an argument that few executives in the industry have stated this plainly: negotiation determines the outcome of nearly every litigated claim, yet remains one of the least systematically developed skills inside claims and defense organizations.
After 30+ years in claims leadership, Glenn isn't speculating. She's diagnosing.
98 to 99% of litigated matters resolve through negotiation, not trial. That single statistic should reshape how every carrier views litigation work. Yet, as Glenn points out, negotiation receives less training, less structure, and less leadership attention than nearly any other component of the claim lifecycle.
Coverage evaluation, reserving, trial strategy: all systematically taught. Negotiation: largely self-taught. Professionals rely on instincts, individual style, or whatever experience they accumulate over years of handling files.
The result is predictable: wide variability, inconsistent quality, and missed opportunities.
Glenn's most powerful contribution is the math. A typical claim professional manages roughly $5 million in negotiated indemnity annually. Even modest underperformance compounds quickly:
Now multiply across an entire claims organization. These aren't abstract figures. They're real dollars leaving the system because defense negotiation capability hasn't kept pace with the plaintiff bar's evolution.
What's revenue-generating for plaintiffs is expense-magnifying for insurers. The asymmetry grows every year.
The defense ecosystem was never built to develop negotiation competency at scale. Law schools don't teach it meaningfully. Claims onboarding rarely goes beyond basics. The traditional apprenticeship model has eroded under the weight of growing caseloads.
Meanwhile, the negotiation environment itself has gotten more complex. Mediators expect structured written framing. Plaintiff counsel bring narrative cohesion, psychological anchoring, and sophisticated analytics. Opening demands often resemble fully articulated trial themes.
Rebuilding negotiation capability isn't a personal improvement project. It's a leadership responsibility. Glenn outlines five priorities:
Technology, Glenn emphasizes, is not a replacement for negotiation skill. It is an amplifier.
Glenn's blueprint maps directly onto what SigmaSight was built to deliver: the infrastructure layer that makes structured, measurable, evidence-based negotiation possible at scale.
Our platform supports the cultural shift Glenn describes by giving claims organizations the tools to standardize quality across every file, not just the ones handled by the most experienced professionals. Three products, one ecosystem:
The plaintiff bar treats negotiation as a revenue engine. Carriers that rebuild it as a core competency, supported by the right AI infrastructure, are the ones who close the gap.
Read the full article on Carrier Management: Rebuilding Negotiation Talent: Why This Skill Is Missing and How to Fix It
Ready to turn negotiation into a measurable competency across your organization? Request a demo of Negotiator.
Learn more about how SigmaSight can change the way you do business.
